And, you do have options.
The so-called Designer themes (Simple, Watermark, Awesome, Picture Window, and Travel) were introduced in 2010, when mobile web browsing was in its infancy.
But it only took a year for Google to release mobile versions for these themes.
The mobile Designer themes have some drawbacks (described below). However, they present individual blog posts in a straightforward, uncluttered way that makes good use of tiny phone-screen real estate.
Designer-based mobile themes
|
| Selecting mobile themes based on Awesome |
The available options correspond to the basic designs and color schemes provided as starting points by Google on the Theme page.
You don't have to use the same theme as your desktop. But why would you choose a different one?
Custom mobile theme
Dynamic mobile theme
(I've published a guide to all the Blogger themes—Designer, Dynamic, Responsive, etc.)
The effect has a similar feel to the light version of the Simple theme, but is less compact. It shows the whole blog post.
Default mobile theme
If you have made no modifications to the theme, Default shows the colors and fonts that came with that theme.
No mobile theme
Every mobile theme, except the Dynamic one, has a link at the bottom to the web version. You readers can choose that if they prefer it.
Mobile theme limitations
If you have a navigational menu at the top, in mobile view it changes from a collection of tabs or visible links to a drop-down menu. This functions but gives no clear cues to your reader about what it is.
(The Dynamic mobile theme's menu bar expands into a row of links if the view screen is wide enough, so its links could be visible on a tablet.)
I can make the case for any of these choices, and it's up to you (obviously), but here is my opinion.
My take
|
| Phone screen shot using the non-mobile "web" option. To be fair, you can reverse-pinch to expand, etc. But will readers do that? |
That does not apply to the newer Responsive themes, where the desktop and mobile themes are the same theme.
I would probably also stick with the desktop version of a Dynamic theme, too, but I do not really have enough experience to say. Test things out (and let us know!), if you are interested.
Best mobile theme
That is the option that most makes your blog on mobile look like your blog on desktop while preserving the mobile-friendly layout.
If you want a super clean version, Simple Light is a good choice, and you might consider the Dynamic alternative.
Of course, there is another option, beyond the scope of this report: to convert your entire blog to a single responsive theme.
That's not for everyone but it is worth thinking over.
None of these solutions is perfect because phones have finite tiny acreage and there are tradeoffs in any design. You get to decide what's best, though.
There is a Preview option when trying out these themes. You should use it before saving any changes.
Links
- History of Blogger themes
- Mobile themes explained by Google.
Photo of woman with phone: Alex Green/Pixels


Thank you Adam.
ReplyDeleteThankfully I didn't have to do any tweaks on blogger for mine.
I like my mobile version as I generally like to reduce clutter on the blog. So, for me, it gives it a tidy look. I have the same approach for the ordinary webpage too.
I think anyone creating a new blog should use a responsive theme. That allows your blog to look good no matter the device size.
ReplyDeleteIt's trickier if you have an existing blog, because it might not be possible to get the responsive design to match the non-responsive environment you're already using.
When I finally applied a responsive theme to my apple blog, I had to reformat nearly all the older posts. Photos were too small, some placements funny, line spacing was off, and so forth.
DeleteI'm pleased with the result but it was a lot of fussy work.
One of the problems with these themes is that they don't have enough space to place the search widget and archives. Before using a responsive theme (which is what I recommend), I had to learn how to place widgets within pages, create one with the search and archives, and make it appear only on the mobile version. A lot of work.
ReplyDeleteThey are, as you suggest, quite limited. I do think they are better than the web view they replaced.
DeleteThey are definitely better than the web view.
Delete