JOHN KRATZ
|
That's the result of two recent changes to how Blogger handles images.
Consequently it is no longer necessary to resize images before adding them to your blog.
This is a handy new feature, though a small class of bloggers may be inconvenienced by it.
The story thus far
Google Drive currently provides 15 GB of free online storage with every account.This includes photos and Gmail emails and attachments, as well as Google Drive docs. Users can add to that allotment as needed.
Originally, Google provided smaller chunks of free storage for different services (it's complicated).
Still, it excluded from the storage quota any Blogger photos that were no larger than 800 pixels in either height or width.
You could add as many images as you liked to your blog as long as you resized them to fit. Those photos simply didn't count.
When Google+ was introduced, Google offered an incentive. If you linked your blog to Google+, the maximum image size would be 2,048 pixels on a side.
The old 800-pixel threshold remained for regular blogger accounts.
What's new
Since then, Google has made the following two significant changes:- It extended the more-generous 2,048-pixel threshold to all accounts
- It began automatically resizing all photos uploaded into Blogger to fit into the 2,048-pixel cap.
The result is that today any image you upload into your blog is resized so as not to count towards your storage quota.
You no longer have to worry about storage when you upload pictures to your blog.
High-but-not-highest quality
A similar option is available as a choice in Google Photos, Google's online photo storage. But for Blogger, it is not just on by default, there is no option to change it.Above: Preferences from Google Photos, where upload quality is a choice. There's no choice in Blogger. |
Google's name for this option, "high quality," is a little confusing. If you upload a larger image under this option it will be shrunk, with some loss of quality.
But it's justified, because for most of us 2,048 pixels is high quality.
Doubly so for Blogger, because your blog can't display big images at high-res anyway. Blogger compresses the image to fit before rendering it.
What's lost
The only people who might be inconvenienced by this change are those who use their blogs to make very large images available on the web. Presumably these people pay Google for extra storage.This is not most Bloggers. But now these folks will have to find another workflow.
One option: Upload to Photos at "original" quality, then insert each into the blog using "add from url."
Still resize anyway?
With this move, Google has simplified blogging by eliminating the need to
resize photos before upload.
You might still want to downsize images. A small image can't be stolen and
used in (say) a large printed photo spread, precisely because it is not a
high-quality version.
Smaller photos still work in your blog, which is a low-res environment that does not need a lot of pixels.
Smaller photos still work in your blog, which is a low-res environment that does not need a lot of pixels.
However, you no longer have to resize to avoid using your storage quota.
It's taken care of.
It's taken care of.
Note well
- Blogger stashes your uploaded images in a Media Manager album. Yours is here.
- These albums are not the same thing as Google Photos.
- Use Google Photos to share, annotate, classify, manage, and sort your images. You can't do anything like that in the Blogger media manager.
- Previously, you had to resize your blogger images if you wanted unlimited photos on Blogger. You don't have to do that any more, though you still can.
- For more information, check out all my posts about images on Blogger.
Thanks, JayBee! Jaybee has a photo blog on Blogger (with some striking images).
ReplyDeleteJayBee, will this change affect how you do your blog?
Hi Adam - how did you find out about these changes?
ReplyDeleteHi Mary. I learned of it from an interaction on the Blogger Help Forum. See especially the user's last post (as of Nov. 24).
DeleteI then tested this by uploading into Blogger a very large ,jpg and then downloading the copy that was in the album archive.
That copy conformed to the 2,048-pixel limit and was much smaller.
Probably the first benefit, extending 2,048 to non-G+ bloggers, has been around for a while, but I think the second, automatic resizing, is probably recent.
It is not reflected on the official help page for images in Blogger, which (as of today anyway) still warns that photos larger than 2,048 pixels will "count towards your storage limit."
My Blogger profile is connected to g+ and i have set "full size" quality photos. I made a test with 5312x2988px photo and i was able to download the same large file from the album archive.
ReplyDeleteThat is interesting, Arkadiusz, and thank you for telling us about it. Would you mind sharing the url from either blog or archive?
DeleteI appreciate Arkadiusz's comments, and cannot explain them, but after doing a whole lot of double checking I stand by my original assessment.
DeleteBlogger now resizes any direct uploads (from desktop to blog). These images do not count against your free usage and are in effect unlimited.
Jaybee, I think you are confused. Those settings in Blogger (small to original) control how big the image is rendered on the blog. They have nothing to do with how the photos are stored.
ReplyDeleteThe whole point if this post is that you no longer have to worry about the size of the photos that you upload into your blog. You can shrink them if you like (I still do) but it is not required.
message came on that illustrations were not going to be saved. preview showed they were gone. what's up?
ReplyDeleteSorry, Lyn, I don't understand. If this has to do with Blogger, may I direct you to the Blogger help community (link in sidebar)? There are some very helpful people there.
DeleteHello. I would like to ask, what is the current situation with storing photos in Blogger for 2023?
ReplyDeleteIs it the same or has something changed?
Hi, KachkaBox,
DeleteEverything in this post remains true: free, unlimited photos if you upload into Blogger.
There are some changes to how Google stores them, and to the user interface, but it is the same deal.
Great :)
DeleteThanks for the quick reply.